rep 0 google, microsoft, facebook, atwitter hosted by the pew center starting at 9:00 a.m. eastern on c-span3. >> the supreme court will look what was passed in 2008 by a majority 6-3, i believe, and they will say that it is precedent. and indiana had a free voter i.d. >> let's talk about the facts. they decided on the indiana case that it was constitutional for them to establish identification. they did not say that all those things were subsequent. >> correct, they talked about indiana. let me finish. umass represented what i said. >> no i did not. >> hold on. >> the supreme court is the law of the land. when i hear these accusations that voter i.d. laws disproportionately affect minorities, it implies to me that we have something missing in our brand. to me, if a white american can get an id to vote and go to the process to follow the law, what are you telling black people? somehow they are not good enough? they are greater than? that's what bothers me about a lot of the rhetoric coming from democrats and laughed. we always have to make special concessions when we do wit